Book Two
Book Three
Book Two Table of Contents:
CHAPTER I.--Describes two different nights through which spiritual persons
pass, according to the two parts of man
CHAPTER II.--Explains the nature of this dark
night through which the soul says that it has passed on the road to union
CHAPTER III.--Speaks of the first cause of
this night: the privation of the desire in all things
CHAPTER IV.--How necessary
it is for the soul truly to pass through this dark night of sense
CHAPTER V.--It is shown by passages from Scripture how necessary it is for soul to journey to God through
this dark night
CHAPTER
VI.--Wherein are treated two serious evils caused in the soul by the desires,
CHAPTER
VII.--Wherein is shown how the desires torment the soul. This is proved likewise by
comparisons and quotations
CHAPTER
VIII.--Wherein is shown how the desires darken and blind the soul
CHAPTER IX.--Wherein
is described how the desires defile the soul.
CHAPTER X.--Wherein
is described how the desires weaken the soul in virtue and make it lukewarm
CHAPTER
XI.--Wherein it is proved necessary that the soul that would attain to Divine union
should be free from desires
CHAPTER
XII.--Explaining what the desires are
that cause the evils aforementioned in the soul
CHAPTER
XIII.--Wherein is described the manner and way which the soul must follow in order to
enter this night of sense
CHAPTER
XIV.--Wherein is expounded the second line of the stanza
CHAPTER
XV.--Wherein are expounded the remaining lines of the aforementioned stanza
BOOK ONE
Wherein is described the nature of dark
night and how necessary it is to pass through it to Divine union; and in particular this
book describes the dark night of sense, and desire, and the evils which these work in the
soul.[73]
CHAPTER I
Sets down the first stanza. Describes two
different nights through which spiritual persons pass, according to the two parts of man,
the lower and the higher. Expounds the stanza which follows.
STANZA THE FIRST
On a dark night, Kindled in love with
yearnings -- oh, happy chance! -- I went forth without being observed, My house being now
at rest.
IN this first stanzas the soul sings of the
happy fortune and chance which it experienced in going forth from all things that are
without, and from the desires[1] and imperfections that are in the sensual[2] part of man
because of the disordered state of his reason. For the understanding of this it must be
known that, for a soul to attain to the state of perfection, it has ordinarily first to
pass through two principal kinds of night, which spiritual persons call purgations or
purifications of the soul; and here we call them nights, for in both of them the soul
journeys, as it were, by night, in darkness.
2. The first night or purgation is of the
sensual part of the soul, which is treated in the present stanza, and will be treated in
the first part of this book. And the second is of the spiritual part; of this speaks the
second stanza, which follows; and of this we shall treat likewise, in the second and the
third part,[76] with respect to the activity of the soul; and in the fourth part, with
respect to its passitivity.
3. And this first night pertains to
beginners, occurring at the time when God begins to bring them into the state of
contemplation; in this night the spirit likewise has a part, as we shall say in due
course. And the second night, or purification, pertains to those who are already
proficient, occurring at the time when God desires to bring them to the state of union
with God. And this latter night is a more obscure and dark and terrible purgation, as we
shall say afterwards.
4. Briefly, then, the soul means by this
stanza that it went forth (being led by God) for love of Him alone, enkindled in love of
Him, upon a dark night, which is the privation and purgation of all its sensual desires,
with respect to all outward things of the world and to those which were delectable to its
flesh, and likewise with respect to the desires of its will. This all comes to pass in
this purgation of sense; for which cause the soul says that it went forth while its house
was still at rest;[77] which house is its sensual part, the desires being at rest and
asleep in it, as it is to them.[78] For there is no going forth from the pains and
afflictions of the secret places of the desires until these be mortified and put to sleep.
And this, the soul says, was a happy chance for it -- namely, its going forth without
being observed: that is, without any desire of its flesh or any other thing being able to
hinder it. And likewise, because it went out by night -- which signifies the privation of
all these things wrought in it by God, which privation was night for it.
5. And it was a happy chance that God should
lead it into this night, from which there came to it so much good; for of itself the soul
would not have succeeded in entering therein, because no man of himself can succeed in
voiding himself of all his desires in order to come to God. 6. This is, in brief, the
exposition of the stanza; and we shall now have to go through it, line by line, setting
down one line after another, and expounding that which pertains to our purpose. And the
same method is followed in the other stanzas, as I said in the Prologue[79] -- namely,
that each stanza will be set down and expounded, and afterwards each line.
CHAPTER
II
Explains the nature of this dark night
through which the soul says that it has passed on the road to union.
On A Dark Night
WE may say that there are three reasons for
which this journey[80] made by the soul to union with God is called night. The first has
to do with the point from which the soul goes forth, for it has gradually to deprive
itself of desire for all the worldly things which it possessed, by denying them to
itself;[81] the which denial and deprivation are, as it were, night to all the senses of
man. The second reason has to do with the mean,[82] or the road along which the soul must
travel to this union -- that is, faith, which is likewise as dark as night to the
understanding. The third has to do with the point to which it travels -- namely, God, Who,
equally, is dark night to the soul in this life. These three nights must pass through the
soul -- or, rather, the soul must pass through them -- in order that it may come to Divine
union with God.
2. In the book of the holy Tobias these
three kinds of night were shadowed forth by the three nights which, as the angel
commanded, were to pass ere the youth Tobias should be united with his bride. In the first
he commanded him to burn the heart of the fish in the fire, which signifies the heart that
is affectioned to, and set upon, the things of the world; which, in order that one may
begin to journey toward God, must be burned and purified from all that is creature, in the
fire of the love of God. And in this purgation the devil flees away, for he has power over
the soul only when it is attached to things corporeal and temporal.
3. On the second night the angel told him
that he would be admitted into the company of the holy patriarchs, who are the fathers of
the faith. For, passing through the first night, which is self-privation of all objects of
sense, the soul at once enters into the second night, and abides alone in faith to the
exclusion, not of charity, but of other knowledge acquired by the understanding, as we
shall say hereafter, which is a thing that pertains not to sense.
4. On the third night the angel told him
that he would obtain a blessing, which is God; Who, by means of the second night, which is
faith, continually communicates Himself to the soul in such a secret and intimate manner
that He becomes another night to the soul, inasmuch as this said communication is far
darker than those others, as we shall say presently. And, when this third night is past,
which is the complete accomplishment of the communication of God in the spirit, which is
ordinarily wrought in great darkness of the soul, there then follows its union with the
Bride, which is the Wisdom of God. Even so the angel said likewise to Tobias that, when
the third night was past, he should be united with his bride in the fear of the Lord; for,
when this fear of God is perfect, love is perfect, and this comes to pass when the
transformation of the soul is wrought through its love.
5. These three parts of the night are all
one night; but, after the manner of night, it has three parts. For the first part, which
is that of sense, is comparable to the beginning of night, the point at which things begin
to fade from sight. And the second part, which is faith, is comparable to midnight, which
is total darkness. And the third part is like the close of night, which is God, the which
part is now near to the light of day. And, that we may understand this the better, we
shall treat of each of these reasons separately as we proceed.
CHAPTER
III
Speaks of the first cause of this night,
which is that of the privation of the desire in all things, and gives the reason for which
it is called night.
WE here describe as night the privation of
every kind of pleasure which belongs to the desire; for, even as night is naught but the
privation of light, and, consequently, of all objects that can be seen by means of light,
whereby the visual faculty remains unoccupied[83] and in darkness, even so likewise the
mortification of desire may be called night to the soul. For, when the soul is deprived of
the pleasure of its desire in all things, it remains, as it were, unoccupied and in
darkness. For even as the visual faculty, by means of light, is nourished and fed by
objects which can be seen, and which, when the light is quenched, are not seen, even so,
by means of the desire, the soul is nourished and fed by all things wherein it can take
pleasure according to its faculties; and, when this also is quenched, or rather,
mortified, the soul ceases to feed upon the pleasure of all things, and thus, with respect
to its desire, it remains unoccupied and in darkness.
2. Let us take an example from each of the
faculties. When the soul deprives its desire of the pleasure of all that can delight the
sense of hearing, the soul remains unoccupied and in darkness with respect to this
faculty. And, when it deprives itself of the pleasure of all that can please the sense of
sight, it remains unoccupied and in darkness with respect to this faculty also. And, when
it deprives itself of the pleasure of all the sweetness of perfumes which can give it
pleasure through the sense of smell, it remains equally unoccupied and in darkness
according to this faculty. And, if it also denies itself the pleasure of all food that can
satisfy the palate, the soul likewise remains unoccupied and in darkness. And finally,
when the soul mortifies itself with respect to all the delights and pleasures that it can
receive from the sense of touch, it remains, in the same way, unoccupied and in darkness
with respect to this faculty. So that the soul that has denied and thrust away from itself
the pleasures which come from all these things, and has mortified its desire with respect
to them, may be said to be, as it were, in the darkness of night, which is naught else
than an emptiness within itself of all things.
3. The reason for this is that, as the
philosophers say, the soul, as soon as God infuses it into the body, is like a smooth,
blank board[84] upon which nothing is painted; and, save for that which it experiences
through the senses, nothing is communicated to it, in the course of nature, from any other
source. And thus, for as long as it is in the body, it is like one who is in a dark prison
and who knows nothing, save what he is able to see through the windows of the said prison;
and, if he saw nothing through them, he would see nothing in any other way. And thus the
soul, save for that which is communicated to it through the senses, which are the windows
of its prison, could acquire nothing, in the course of nature, in any other way.
4. Wherefore, if the soul rejects and denies
that which it can receive through the senses, we can quite well say that it remains, as it
were, in darkness and empty; since, as appears from what has been said, no light can enter
it, in the course of nature, by any other means of illumination than those aforementioned.
For, although it is true that the soul cannot help hearing and seeing and smelling and
tasting and touching, this is of no greater import, nor, if the soul denies and rejects
the object, is it hindered more than if it saw it not, heard it not, etc. Just so a man
who desires to shut his eyes will remain in darkness, like the blind man who has not the
faculty of sight. And to this purpose David says these words: Pauper sum ego, et in
laboribus a indenture mea.[85] Which signifies: I am poor and in labours from my youth. He
calls himself poor, although it is clear that he was rich, because his will was not set
upon riches, and thus it was as though he were really poor. But if he had not been really
poor and had not been so in his will, he would not have been truly poor, for his soul, as
far as its desire was concerned, would have been rich and replete. For that reason we call
this detachment night to the soul, for we are not treating here of the lack of things,
since this implies no detachment on the part of the soul if it has a desire for them; but
we are treating of the detachment from them of the taste and desire, for it is this that
leaves the soul free and void of them, although it may have them; for it is not the things
of this world that either occupy the soul or cause it harm, since they enter it not, but
rather the will and desire for them, for it is these that dwell within it.
5. This first kind of night, as we shall say
hereafter, belongs to the soul according to its sensual part, which is one of the two
parts, whereof we spoke above, through which the soul must pass in order to attain to
union.
6. Let us now say how meet it is for the
soul to go forth from its house into this dark night of sense, in order to travel to union
with God.
CHAPTER
IV
Wherein is declared how necessary it is for
the soul truly to pass through this dark night of sense, which is mortification of desire,
in order that it may journey to union with God.
THE reason for which it is necessary for the
soul, in order to attain to Divine union with God, to pass through this dark night of
mortification of the desires and denial of pleasures in all things, is because all the
affections which it has for creatures are pure darkness in the eyes of God, and, when the
soul is clothed in these affections, it has no capacity for being enlightened and
possessed by the pure and simple light of God, if it first cast them not from it; for
light cannot agree with darkness; since, as Saint John says: Tenebroe eam non
comprehenderunt.[86] That is: The darkness could not receive the light.
2. The reason is that two contraries (even
as philosophy teaches us) cannot coexist in one person; and that darkness, which is
affection set upon the creatures, and light, which is God, are contrary to each other, and
have no likeness or accord between one another, even as Saint Paul taught the Corinthians,
saying: Quoe conventio luci ad tenebras?[87] That is to say: What communion can there be
between light and darkness? Hence it is that the light of Divine union cannot dwell in the
soul if these affections first flee not away from it.
3. In order that we may the better prove
what has been said, it must be known that the affection and attachment which the soul has
for creatures renders the soul like to these creatures; and, the greater is its affection,
the closer is the equality and likeness between them; for love creates a likeness between
that which loves and that which is loved. For which reason David, speaking of those who
set their affections upon idols, said thus: Similes illis fiant qui faciunt ea: et omnes
qui confidunt in eis.[88] Which signifies: Let them that set their heart upon them be like
to them. And thus, he that loves a creature becomes as low as that creature, and, in some
ways, lower; for love not only makes the lover equal to the object of his love, but even
subjects him to it. Hence in the same way it comes to pass that the soul that loves
anything else becomes incapable of pure union with God and transformation in Him. For the
low estate of the creature is much less capable of union with the high estate of the
Creator than is darkness with light. For all things of earth and heaven, compared with
God, are nothing, as Jeremias says in these words: Aspexi terram, et ecce vacua erat, et
nihil; et coelos, et non erat lux in eis.[89] 'I beheld the earth,' he says, 'and it was
void, and it was nothing; and the heavens, and saw that they had no light.' In saying that
he beheld the earth void, he means that all its creatures were nothing, and that the earth
was nothing likewise. And, in saying that he beheld the heavens and saw no light in them,
he says that all the luminaries of heaven, compared with God, are pure darkness. So that
in this way all the creatures are nothing; and their affections, we may say, are less than
nothing, since they are an impediment to transformation in God and the privation thereof,
even as darkness is not only nothing, but less than nothing, since it is privation of
light. And even as he that is in darkness comprehends not the light, so the soul that sets
its affection upon creatures will be unable to comprehend God; and, until it be purged, it
will neither be able to possess Him here below, through pure transformation of love, nor
yonder in clear vision. And, for greater clarity, we will now speak in greater detail.
4. All the being of creation, then, compared
with the infinite Being of God, is nothing. And therefore the soul that sets its affection
upon the being of creation is likewise nothing in the eyes of God, and less than nothing;
for, as we have said, love makes equality and similitude, and even sets the lover below
the object of his love. And therefore such a soul will in no wise be able to attain to
union with the infinite Being of God; for that which is not can have no communion with
that which is. And, coming down in detail to some examples, all the beauty of the
creatures, compared with the infinite beauty of God, is the height of deformity[90] even
as Solomon says in the Proverbs: Fallax gratia, et vana est pulchritudo.[91] 'Favour is
deceitful and beauty is vain.' And thus the soul that is affectioned to the beauty of any
creature is the height of deformity in the eyes of God. And therefore this soul that is
deformed will be unable to become transformed in beauty, which is God, since deformity
cannot attain to beauty; and all the grace and beauty of the creatures, compared with the
grace of God, is the height of misery[92] and of uncomeliness. Wherefore the soul that is
ravished by the graces and beauties of the creatures has only supreme[93] misery and
unattractiveness in the eyes of God; and thus it cannot be capable of the infinite grace
and loveliness of God; for that which has no grace is far removed from that which is
infinitely gracious; and all the goodness of the creatures of the world, in comparison
with the infinite goodness of God, may be described as wickedness. 'For there is naught
good, save only God.'[94] And therefore the soul that sets its heart upon the good things
of the world is supremely evil in the eyes of God. And, even as wickedness comprehends not
goodness, even so such a soul cannot be united with God, Who is supreme goodness.
5. All the wisdom of the world and all human
ability, compared with the infinite wisdom of God, are pure and supreme ignorance, even as
Saint Paul writes ad Corinthios, saying: Sapientia hujus mundi stultitia est apud
Deum.[95] 'The wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.' Wherefore any soul that
makes account of all its knowledge and ability in order to come to union with the wisdom
of God is supremely ignorant in the eyes of God and will remain far removed from that
wisdom; for ignorance knows not what wisdom is, even as Saint Paul says that this wisdom
seems foolishness to God; since, in the eyes of God, those who consider themselves to be
persons with a certain amount of knowledge are very ignorant, so that the Apostle, writing
to the Romans, says of them: Dicentes enim se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt. That is:
Professing themselves to be wise, they became foolish.[96] And those alone acquire wisdom
of God who are like ignorant children, and, laying aside their knowledge, walk in His
service with love. This manner of wisdom Saint Paul taught likewise ad Corinthios: Si quis
videtur inter vos sapiens esse in hoc soeculo, stultus fiat ut sit sapiens. Sapientia enim
hujus mundi stultitia est apud Deum.[97] That is: If any man among you seem to be wise,
let him become ignorant that he may be wise; for the wisdom of this world is foolishness
with God. So that, in order to come to union with the wisdom of God, the soul has to
proceed rather by unknowing than by knowing; and all the dominion and liberty of the
world, compared with the liberty and dominion of the Spirit of God, is the most abject[98]
slavery, affliction and captivity.
6. Wherefore the soul that is enamoured of
prelacy,[99] or of any other such office, and longs for liberty of desire, is considered
and treated, in the sight of God, not as a son, but as a base slave and captive, since it
has not been willing to accept His holy doctrine, wherein He teaches us that whoso would
be greater must be less, and whoso would be less must be greater. And therefore such a
soul will be unable to attain to that true liberty of spirit which is attained in His
Divine union. For slavery can have no part with liberty; and liberty cannot dwell in a
heart that is subject to desires, for this is the heart of a slave; but it dwells in the
free man, because he has the heart of a son. It was for this cause that Sara bade her
husband Abraham cast out the bondwoman and her son, saying that the son of the bondwoman
should not be heir with the son of the free woman.[100]
7. And all the delights and pleasures of the
will in all the things of the world, in comparison with all those delights which are God,
are supreme affliction, torment and bitterness. And thus he that sets his heart upon them
is considered, in the sight of God, as worthy of supreme affliction, torment and
bitterness; and thus he will be unable to attain to the delights of the embrace of union
with God, since he is worthy of affliction and bitterness. All the wealth and glory of all
creation, in comparison with the wealth which is God, is supreme poverty and wretchedness.
Thus the soul that loves and possesses creature wealth is supremely poor and wretched in
the sight of God, and for that reason will be unable to attain to that wealth and glory
which is the state of transformation in God; for that which is miserable and poor is
supremely far removed from that which is supremely rich and glorious. 8. And therefore
Divine Wisdom, grieving for such as these, who make themselves vile, low, miserable and
poor, because they love the things in this world which seem to them so rich and beautiful,
addresses an exclamation to them in the Proverbs, saying: O viri, ad vos clamito, et vox
mea ad filios hominum. Intelligite, parvuli, astutiam, et insipientes, animadvertite.
Audite quia de rebus magnis locutura sum. And farther on he continues: Mecum sunt divitoe,
et gloria, opes superboe et justicia. Melior est fructus meus auro, et lapide pretioso, et
genimina mea argento electo. In viis justitioe ambulo, in medio semitarum judicii, ut
ditem diligentes me, et thesauros eorum repleam.[101] Which signifies: O ye men, to you I
call, and my voice is to the sons of men. Attend, little ones, to subtlety and sagacity;
ye that are foolish, take notice. Hear, for I have to speak of great things. With me are
riches and glory, high riches and justice. Better is the fruit that ye will find in me
than gold and precious stones; and my generation -- namely, that which ye will engender of
me in your souls -- is better than choice silver. I walk in the ways of justice, in the
midst of the paths of judgment, that I may enrich those that love me and fill their
treasures perfectly. -- Herein Divine Wisdom speaks to all those that set their hearts and
affections upon anything of the world, according as we have already said. And she calls
them 'little ones,' because they make themselves like to that which they love, which is
little. And therefore she tells them to be subtle and to take note that she is treating of
great things and not of things that are little like themselves. That the great riches and
the glory that they love are with her and in her, and not where they think. And that high
riches and justice dwell in her; for, although they think the things of this world to be
all this, she tells them to take note that her things are better, saying that the fruit
that they will find in them will be better for them than gold and precious stones; and
that which she engenders in souls is better than the choice silver which they love; by
which is understood any kind of affection that can be possessed in this life.
CHAPTER V
Wherein the aforementioned subject is
treated and continued, and it is shown by passages and figures from Holy Scripture how
necessary it is for the soul to journey to God through this dark night of the
mortification of desire in all things.
FROM what has been said it may be seen in
some measure how great a distance there is between all that the creatures are in
themselves and that which God is in Himself, and how souls that set their affections upon
any of these creatures are at as great a distance as they from God; for, as we have said,
love produces equality and likeness. This distance was clearly realized by Saint
Augustine, who said in the Sololoquies, speaking with God: 'Miserable man that I am, when
will my littleness and imperfection be able to have fellowship with Thy uprightness? Thou
indeed art good, and I am evil; Thou art merciful, and I am impious; Thou art holy, I am
miserable; Thou art just, I am unjust; Thou art light, I am blind; Thou, life, I, death;
Thou, medicine, I, sick; Thou, supreme truth, I, utter vanity.' All this is said by this
Saint.[102]
2. Wherefore, it is supreme ignorance for
the soul to think that it will be able to pass to this high estate of union with God if
first it void not the desire of all things, natural and supernatural, which may hinder it,
according as we shall explain hereafter;[103] for there is the greatest possible distance
between these things and that which comes to pass in this estate, which is naught else
than transformation in God. For this reason Our Lord, when showing us this path, said
through Saint Luke: Qui non renuntiat omnibus quoe possidet, non potest meus esse
discipulus.[104] This signifies: He that renounces not all things that he possesses with
his will cannot be My disciple. And this is evident; for the doctrine that the Son of God
came to teach was contempt for all things, whereby a man might receive as a reward the
Spirit of God in himself. For, as long as the soul rejects not all things, it has no
capacity to receive the Spirit of God in pure transformation.
3. Of this we have a figure in Exodus,
wherein we read that God gave not the children of Israel the food from Heaven, which was
manna, until the flour which they had brought from Egypt failed them. By this is signified
that first of all it is meet to renounce all things, for this angels' food is not fitting
for the palate that would find delight in the food of men. And not only does the soul
become incapable of receiving the Divine Spirit when it stays and pastures on other
strange pleasures, but those souls greatly offend the Divine Majesty who desire spiritual
food and are not content with God alone, but desire rather to intermingle desire and
affection for other things. This can likewise be seen in the same book of Holy
Scripture,[105] wherein it is said that, not content with that simplest of food, they
desired and craved fleshly food.[106] And that Our Lord was greatly wroth that they should
desire to intermingle a food that was so base and so coarse with one that was so
noble[107] and so simple; which, though it was so, had within itself the sweetness and
substance of all foods.[108] Wherefore, while they yet had the morsels in their mouths, as
David says likewise: Ira Dei descendit super eos.[109] The wrath of God came down upon
them, sending fire from Heaven and consuming many thousands of them; for God held it an
unworthy thing that they should have a desire for other food when He had given them food
from Heaven.
4. Oh, did spiritual persons but know how
much good and what great abundance of spirit they lose through not seeking to raise up
their desires above childish things, and how in this simple spiritual food they would find
the sweetness of all things, if they desired not to taste those things! But such food
gives them no pleasure, for the reason why the children of Israel received not the
sweetness of all foods that was contained in the manna was that they would not reserve
their desire for it alone. So that they failed to find in the manna all the sweetness and
strength that they could wish, not because it was not contained in the manna, but because
they desired some other thing. Thus he that will love some other thing together with God
of a certainty makes little account of God, for he weighs in the balance against God that
which, as we have said, is at the greatest possible distance from God.
5. It is well known by experience that, when
the will of a man is affectioned to one thing, he prizes it more than any other; although
some other thing may be much better, he takes less pleasure in it. And if he wishes to
enjoy both, he is bound to wrong the more important, because he makes an equality between
them. Wherefore, since there is naught that equals God, the soul that loves some other
thing together with Him, or clings to it, does Him a grievous wrong. And if this is so,
what would it be doing if it loved anything more than God?
6. It is this, too, that was denoted by the
command of God to Moses that he should ascend the Mount to speak with Him: He commanded
him not only to ascend it alone, leaving the children of Israel below, but not even to
allow the beasts to feed over against the Mount.[110] By this He signified that the soul
that is to ascend this mount of perfection, to commune with God, must not only renounce
all things and leave them below, but must not even allow the desires, which are the
beasts, to pasture over against this mount -- that is, upon other things which are not
purely God, in Whom -- that is, in the state of perfection -- every desire ceases. So he
that journeys on the road and makes the ascent to God must needs be habitually careful to
quell and mortify the desires; and the greater the speed wherewith a soul does this, the
sooner will it reach the end of its journey. Until these be quelled, it cannot reach the
end, however much it practise the virtues, since it is unable to attain to perfection in
them; for this perfection consists in voiding and stripping and purifying the soul of
every desire. Of this we have another very striking figure in Genesis, where we read that,
when the patriarch Jacob desired to ascend Mount Bethel, in order to build an altar there
to God whereon he should offer Him sacrifice, he first commanded all his people to do
three things: one was that they should cast away from them all strange gods; the second,
that they should purify themselves; the third, that they should change their
garments.[111]
7. By these three things it is signified
that any soul that will ascend this mount in order to make of itself an altar whereon it
may offer to God the sacrifice of pure love and praise and pure reverence, must, before
ascending to the summit of the mount, have done these three things aforementioned
perfectly. First, it must cast away all strange gods -- namely, all strange affections and
attachments; secondly, it must purify itself of the remnants which the desires
aforementioned have left in the soul, by means of the dark night of sense whereof we are
speaking, habitually denying them and repenting itself of them; and thirdly, in order to
reach the summit of this high mount, it must have changed its garments, which, through its
observance of the first two things, God will change for it, from old to new, by giving it
a new understanding of God in God, the old human understanding being cast aside; and a new
love of God in God, the will being now stripped of all its old desires and human
pleasures, and the soul being brought into a new state of knowledge and profound delight,
all other old images and forms of knowledge having been cast away, and all that belongs to
the old man, which is the aptitude of the natural self, quelled, and the soul clothed with
a new supernatural aptitude with respect to all its faculties. So that its operation,
which before was human, has become Divine, which is that that is attained in the state of
union, wherein the soul becomes naught else than an altar whereon God is adored in praise
and love, and God alone is upon it. For this cause God commanded that the altar whereon
the Ark of the Covenant was to be laid should be hollow within;[112] so that the soul may
understand how completely empty of all things God desires it to be, that it may be an
altar worthy of the presence of His Majesty. On this altar it was likewise forbidden that
there should be any strange fire, or that its own fire should ever fail; and so essential
was this that, because Nadab and Abiu, who were the sons of the High Priest Aaron, offered
strange fire upon His Altar, Our Lord was wroth and slew them there before the altar.[113]
By this we are to understand that the love of God must never fail in the soul, so that the
soul may be a worthy altar, and so that no other love must be mingled with it.
8. God permits not that any other thing
should dwell together with Him. Wherefore we read in the First Book the Kings that, when
the Philistines put the Ark of the Covenant into the temple where their idol was, the idol
was cast down upon the ground at the dawn of each day, and broken to pieces.[114] And He
permits and wills that there should be only one desire where He is, which is to keep the
law of God perfectly, and to bear upon oneself the Cross of Christ. And thus naught else
is said in the Divine Scripture to have been commanded by God to be put in the Ark, where
the manna was, save the book of the Law,[115] and the rod Moses,[116] which signifies the
Cross. For the soul that aspires naught else than the keeping of the law of the Lord
perfectly and the bearing of the Cross of Christ will be a true Ark, containing within
itself the true manna, which is God, when that soul attains to a perfect possession within
itself of this law and this rod, without any other thing soever.
CHAPTER
VI
Wherein are treated two serious evils caused
in the soul by the desires, the one evil being privative and the other positive.
IN order that what we have said may be the
more clearly and fully understood, it will be well to set down here and state how these
desires are the cause of two serious evils in the soul: the one is that they deprive it of
the Spirit of God, and the other is that the soul wherein they dwell is wearied,
tormented, darkened, defiled and weakened, according to that which is said in Jeremias,
Chapter II: Duo mala fecit Populus meus: dereliquerunt fontem aquoe vivoe, et foderunt
sibi cisternas, dissipatas, quoe continere non valent aquas. Which signifies: They have
forsaken Me, Who am the fountain of living water, and they have hewed them out broken
cisterns, that can hold no water.[117] Those two evils -- namely, the privative and the
positive -- may be caused by any disordered act of the desire. And, speaking first of all,
of the privative, it is clear from the very fact that the soul becomes affectioned to a
thing which comes under the head of creature, that the more the desire for that thing
fills the soul,[118] the less capacity has the soul for God; inasmuch as two contraries,
according to the philosophers, cannot coexist in one person; and further, since, as we
said in the fourth chapter, affection for God and affection for creatures are contraries,
there cannot be contained within one will affection for creatures and affection for God.
For what has the creature to do with the Creator? What has sensual to do with spiritual?
Visible with invisible? Temporal with eternal? Food that is heavenly, spiritual and pure
with food that is of sense alone and is purely sensual? Christlike poverty of spirit with
attachment to aught soever?
2. Wherefore, as in natural generation no
form can be introduced unless the preceding, contrary form is first expelled from the
subject, which form, while present, is an impediment to the other by reason of the
contrariety which the two have between each other; even so, for as long as the soul is
subjected to the sensual spirit, the spirit which is pure and spiritual cannot enter it.
Wherefore our Saviour said through Saint Matthew: Non est bonum sumere panem filiorum, et
mittere canibus.[119] That is: It is not meet to take the children's bread and to cast it
to the dogs. And elsewhere, too, he says through the same Evangelist: Nolite sanctum dare
canibus.[120] Which signifies: Give not that which is holy to the dogs. In these passages
Our Lord compares those who renounce their creature-desires, and prepare themselves to
receive the Spirit of God in purity, to the children of God; and those who would have
their desire feed upon the creatures, to dogs. For it is given to children to eat with
their father at table and from his dish, which is to feed upon His Spirit, and to dogs are
given the crumbs which fall from the table.
3. From this we are to learn that all
created things are crumbs that have fallen from the table of God. Wherefore he that feeds
ever upon[121] the creatures is rightly called a dog, and therefore the bread is taken
from the children, because they desire not to rise above feeding upon the crumbs, which
are created things, to the Uncreated Spirit of their Father. Therefore, like dogs, they
are ever hungering, and justly so, because the crumbs serve to whet their appetite rather
than to satisfy their hunger. And thus David says of them: Famem patientur ut canes, et
circuibunt civitatem. Si vero non fuerint saturati, et murmurabunt.[122] Which signifies:
They shall suffer hunger like dogs and shall go round about the city, and, if they find
not enough to fill them, they shall murmur. For this is the nature of one that has
desires, that he is ever discontented and dissatisfied, like one that suffers hunger; for
what has the hunger which all the creatures suffer to do with the fullness which is caused
by the Spirit of God? Wherefore this fullness that is uncreated cannot enter the soul, if
there be not first cast out that other created hunger which belongs to the desire of the
soul; for, as we have said two contraries cannot dwell in one person, the which contraries
in this case are hunger and fullness.
4. From what has been said it will be seen
how much greater is the work of God[123] in the cleansing and the purging of a soul from
these contrarieties than in the creating of that soul from nothing. For thee
contrarieties, these contrary desires and affections, are more completely opposed to God
and offer Him greater resistance than does nothingness; for nothingness resists not at
all. And let this suffice with respect to the first of the important evils which are
inflicted upon the soul by the desires -- namely, resistance to the Spirit of God -- since
much has been said of this above.
5. Let us now speak of the second effect
which they cause in the soul. This is of many kinds, because the desires weary the soul
and torment and darken it, and defile it and weaken it. Of these five things we shall
speak separately, in their turn.
6. With regard to the first, it is clear
that the desires weary and fatigue the soul; for they are like restless and discontented
children, who are ever demanding this or that from their mother, and are never contented.
And even as one that digs because he covets a treasure is wearied and fatigued, even so is
the soul weary and fatigued in order to attain that which its desires demand of it; and
although in the end it may attain it, it is still weary, because it is never satisfied;
for, after all, the cisterns which it is digging are broken, and cannot hold water to
satisfy thirst. And thus, as Isaias says: Lassus adhuc sitit, et anima ejus vacua
est.[124] Which signifies: His desire is empty. And the soul that has desires is wearied
and fatigued; for it is like a man that is sick of a fever, who finds himself no better
until the fever leaves him, and whose thirst increases with every moment. For, as is said
in the Book of Job: Cum satiatus fuerit, arctabitur, oestuabit, et omnis dolor irruet
super eum.[125] Which signifies: When he has satisfied his desire, he will be the more
oppressed and straitened; the heat of desire hath increased in his soul and thus every
sorrow will fall upon him. The soul is wearied and fatigued by its desires, because it is
wounded and moved and disturbed by them as is water by the winds; in just the same way
they disturb it, allowing it not to rest in any place or in any thing soever. And of such
a soul says Isaias: Cor impii quasi mare fervens.[126] 'The heart of the wicked man is
like the sea when it rages.' And he is a wicked man that conquers not his desires. The
soul that would fain satisfy its desires grows wearied and fatigued; for it is like one
that, being an hungered, opens his mouth that he may sate himself with wind, whereupon,
instead of being satisfied, his craving becomes greater, for the wind is no food for him.
To this purpose said Jeremias: In desiderio animoe sum attraxit ventum amoris sui.[127] As
though he were to say: In the desire of his will he snuffed up the wind of his affection.
And he then tries to describe the aridity wherein such a soul remains, and warns it,
saying: Prohibe pedem tuum a nuditate, et guttur tuum a siti.[128] Which signifies: Keep
thy foot (that is, thy thought) from being bare and thy throat from thirst (that is to
say, thy will from the indulgence of the desire which causes greater dryness); and, even
as the lover is wearied and fatigued upon the day of his hopes, when his attempt has
proved to be vain, so the soul is wearied and fatigued by all its desires and by
indulgence in them, since they all cause it greater emptiness and hunger; for, as is often
said, desire is like the fire, which increases as wood is thrown upon it, and which, when
it has consumed the wood, must needs die.
7. And in this regard it is still worse with
desire; for the fire goes down when the wood is consumed, but desire, though it increases
when fuel is added to it, decreases not correspondingly when the fuel is consumed; on the
contrary, instead of going down, as does the fire when its fuel is consumed, it grows weak
through weariness, for its hunger is increased and its food diminished. And of this Isaias
speaks, saying: Declinabit ad dexteram, et esuriet: et comedet ad sinistram, et non
saturabitur.[129] This signifies: He shall turn to the right hand, and shall be hungry;
and he shall eat on the left hand, and shall not be filled. For they that mortify not
their desires, when they 'turn,' justly see the fullness of the sweetness of spirit of
those who are at the right hand of God, which fullness is not granted to themselves; and
justly, too, when they eat on the left hand,[130] by which is meant the satisfaction of
their desire with some creature comfort, they are not filled, for, leaving aside that
which alone can satisfy, they feed on that which causes them greater hunger. It is clear,
then, that the desires weary and fatigue the soul.
CHAPTER
VII
Wherein is shown how the desires torment the
soul. This is proved likewise by comparison and quotations.
THE second kind of positive evil which the
desires cause the soul is in their tormenting and afflicting of it, after the manner of
one who is in torment through being bound with cords from which he has no relief until he
be freed. And of these David says: Funes peccatorum circumplexi sunt me.[131] The cords of
my sins, which are my desires, have constrained me round about. And, even as one that lies
naked upon thorns and briars is tormented and afflicted, even so is the soul tormented and
afflicted when it rests upon its desires. For they take hold upon it and distress it and
cause it pain, even as do thorns. Of these David says likewise: Circumdederunt me sicut
apes: et exarserunt sicut ignis in spinis.[132] Which signifies: They compassed me about
like bees, wounding me with their stings, and they were enkindled against me, like fire
among thorns; for in the desires, which are the thorns, increases the fire of anguish and
torment. And even as the husbandman, coveting the harvest for which he hopes, afflicts and
torments the ox in the plough, even so does concupiscence afflict a soul that is subject
to its desire to attain that for which it longs. This can be clearly seen in that desire
which Dalila had to know whence Samson derived his strength that was so great, for the
Scripture says that it fatigued and tormented her so much that it caused her to swoon,
almost to the point of death, and she said: Defecit anima ejus, et ad mortem usque lassata
est.[133]
2. The more intense is the desire, the
greater is the torment which it causes the soul. So that the torment increases with the
desire; and the greater are the desires which possess the soul, the greater are its
torments; for in such a soul is fulfilled, even in this life, that which is said in the
Apocalypse concerning Babylon, in these words: Quantum glorificavit se, et in deliciis
fuit, tantum date illi tormentum, et luctum.[134] That is: As much as she has wished to
exalt and fulfil her desires, so much give ye to her torment and anguish. And even as one
that falls into the hands of his enemies is tormented and afflicted, even so is the soul
tormented and afflicted that is led away by its desires. Of this there is a figure in the
Book of the Judges, wherein it may be read that that strong man, Samson, who at one time
was strong and free and a judge of Israel, fell into the power of his enemies, and they
took his strength from him, and put out his eyes, and bound him in a mill, to grind
corn,[135] wherein they tormented and afflicted him greatly;[136] and thus it happens to
the soul in which these its enemies, the desires, live and rule; for the first thing that
they do is to weaken the soul and blind it, as we shall say below; and then they afflict
and torment it, binding it to the mill of concupiscence; and the bonds with which it is
bound are its own desires.
3. Wherefore God, having compassion on these
that with such great labour, and at such cost to themselves, go about endeavouring to
satisfy the hunger and thirst of their desire in the creatures, says to them through
Isaias: Omnes sitientes, venite ad aquas; et qui non habetis argentum, properate, emite,
el comedite: venite, emite absque argento vinum et lac. Quare appenditis argentum non in
panibus, et laborem vestrum non in saturitate?[137] As though He were to say: All ye that
have thirst of desire, come to the waters, and all ye that have no silver of your own will
and desires, make haste; buy from Me and eat; come and buy from Me wine and milk (that is,
spiritual sweetness and peace) without the silver of your own will, and without giving Me
any labour in exchange for it, as ye give for your desires. Wherefore do ye give the
silver of your will for that which is not bread -- namely, that of the Divine Spirit --
and set the labour of your desires upon that which cannot satisfy you? Come, hearkening to
Me, and ye shall eat the good that ye desire and your soul shall delight itself in
fatness.
4. This attaining to fatness is a going
forth from all pleasures of the creatures; for the creatures torment, but the Spirit of
God refreshes. And thus He calls us through Saint Matthew, saying: Venite ad me omnes, qui
laboratis et onerati estis, et ego reficiam vos, et invenietis requiem animabus
vestris.[138] As though He were to say: All ye that go about tormented, afflicted and
burdened with the burden of your cares and desires, go forth from them, come to Me, and I
will refresh you and ye shall find for your souls the rest which your desires take from
you, wherefore they are a heavy burden, for David says of them: Sicut onus grave gravatoe
sunt super me.[139]
CHAPTER
VIII
Wherein is shown how the desires darken and
blind the soul.
THE third evil that the desires cause in the
soul is that they blind and darken it. Even as vapours darken the air and allow not the
bright sun to shine; or as a mirror that is clouded over cannot receive within itself a
clear image; or as water defiled by mud reflects not the visage of one that looks therein;
even so the soul that is clouded by the desires is darkened in the understanding and
allows neither[140] the sun of natural reason nor that of the supernatural Wisdom of God
to shine upon it and illumine it clearly. And thus David, speaking to this purpose, says:
Comprehenderunt me iniquitates meoe, et non potui, ut viderem.[141] Which signifies: Mine
iniquities have taken hold upon me, and I could have no power to see.
2. And, at this same time, when the soul is
darkened in the understanding, it is benumbed also in the will, and the memory becomes
dull and disordered in its due operation. For, as these faculties in their operations
depend upon the understanding, it is clear that, when the understanding is impeded, they
will become disordered and troubled. And thus David says: Anima mea turbata est
valde.[142] That is: My soul is sorely troubled. Which is as much as to say, 'disordered
in its faculties.' For, as we say, the understanding has no more capacity for receiving
enlightenment from the wisdom of God than has the air, when it is dark, for receiving
enlightenment from the sun; neither has the will any power to embrace God within itself in
pure love, even as the mirror that is clouded with vapour has no power to reflect clearly
within itself any visage,[143] and even less power has the memory which is clouded by the
darkness of desire to take clearly upon itself the form of the image of God, just as the
muddled water cannot show forth clearly the visage of one that looks at himself therein.
3. Desire blinds and darkens the soul; for
desire, as such, is blind, since of itself it has no understanding in itself, the reason
being to it always, as it were, a child leading a blind man. And hence it comes to pass
that, whensoever the soul is guided by its desire, it becomes blind; for this is as if one
that sees were guided by one that sees not, which is, as it were, for both to be blind.
And that which follows from this is that which Our Lord says through Saint Matthew: Si
coecus coeco ducatum proestet, ambo in foveam cadunt.[144] 'If the blind lead the blind,
both fall into the pit.' Of little use are its eyes to a moth, since desire for the beauty
of the light dazzles it and leads it into the flame.[145] And even so we may say that one
who feeds upon desire is like a fish that is dazzled, upon which the light acts rather as
darkness, preventing it from seeing the snares which the fishermen are preparing for it.
This is very well expressed by David himself, where he says of such persons: Supercecidit
ignis, et non viderunt solem.[146] Which signifies: There came upon them the fire, which
burns with its heat and dazzles with its light. And it is this that desire does to the
soul, enkindling its concupiscence and dazzling its understanding so that it cannot see
its light. For the cause of its being thus dazzled is that when another light of a
different kind is set before the eye, the visual faculty is attracted by that which is
interposed so that it sees not the other; and, as the desire is set so near to the soul as
to be within the soul itself, the soul meets this first light and is attracted by it; and
thus it is unable to see the light of clear understanding, neither will see it until the
dazzling power of desire is taken away from it.
4. For this reason one must greatly lament
the ignorance of certain men, who burden themselves with extraordinary penances and with
many other voluntary practices, and think that this practice or that will suffice to bring
them to the union of Divine Wisdom; but such will not be the case if they endeavour not
diligently to mortify their desires. If they were careful to bestow half of that labour on
this, they would profit more in a month than they profit by all the other practices in
many years. For, just as it is necessary to till the earth if it is to bear fruit, and
unless it be tilled it bears naught but weeds, just so is mortification of the desires
necessary if the soul is to profit. Without this mortification, I make bold to say, the
soul no more achieves progress on the road to perfection and to the knowledge of God of
itself, however many efforts it may make, than the seed grows when it is cast upon
untilled ground. Wherefore the darkness and rudeness of the soul will not be taken from it
until the desires be quenched. For these desires are like cataracts, or like motes in the
eye, which obstruct the sight until they be taken away.
5. And thus David, realizing how blind are
these souls, and how completely impeded from beholding the light of truth, and how wroth
is God with them, speaks to them, saying: Priusquam intelligerent spinoe vestroe rhamnum:
sicut viventes, sic in ira absorber eos.[147] And this is as though He had said: Before
your thorns (that is, your desires) harden and grow, changing from tender thorns into a
thick hedge and shutting out the sight of God even as oft-times the living find their
thread of life broken in the midst of its course, even so will God swallow them up in His
wrath. For the desires that are living in the soul, so that it cannot understand Him,[148]
will be swallowed up by God by means of chastisement and correction, either in this life
or in the next, and this will come to pass through purgation. And He says that He will
swallow them up in wrath, because that which is suffered in the mortification of the
desires is punishment for the ruin which they have wrought in the soul.
6. Oh, if men but knew how great is the
blessing of Divine light whereof they are deprived by this blindness which proceeds from
their affections and desires, and into what great hurts and evils these make them to fall
day after day, for so long as they mortify them not! For a man must not rely upon a clear
understanding, or upon gifts that he has received from God, and think that he may indulge
his affection or desire, and will not be blinded and darkened, and fall gradually into a
worse estate. For who would have said that a man so perfect in wisdom and the gifts of God
as was Solomon would have been reduced to such blindness and torpor of the will as to make
altars to so many idols and to worship them himself, when he was old?[149] Yet no more was
needed to bring him to this than the affection which he had for women and his neglect to
deny the desires and delights of his heart. For he himself says concerning himself, in
Ecclesiastes, that he denied not his heart that which it demanded of him.[150] And this
man was capable of being so completely led away by his desires that, although it is true
that at the beginning he was cautious, nevertheless, because he denied them not, they
gradually blinded and darkened his understanding, so that in the end they succeeded in
quenching that great light of wisdom which God had given him, and therefore in his old age
he foresook God.
7. And if unmortified desires could do so
much in this man who knew so well the distance that lies between good and evil, what will
they not be capable of accomplishing by working upon our ignorance? For we, as God said to
the prophet Jonas concerning the Ninivites, cannot discern between[151] our right hand and
our left.[152] At every step we hold evil to be good, and good, evil, and this arises from
our own nature. What, then, will come to pass if to our natural darkness is added the
hindrance of desire?[153] Naught but that which Isaias describes thus: Palpavimus, sicut
coeci parietem, et quasi absque oculis attreetavimus: impegimus meridie, quasi in
tenebris.[154] The prophet is speaking with those who love to follow these their desires.
It is as if he had said: We have groped for the wall as though we were blind, and we have
been groping as though we had no eyes, and our blindness has attained to such a point that
we have stumbled at midday as though it were in the darkness. For he that is blinded by
desire has this property, that, when he is set in the midst of truth and of that which is
good for him, he can no more see them than if he were in darkness.
CHAPTER
IX
Wherein is described how the desires defile
the soul. This is proved by comparisons and quotations from Holy Scripture.
THE fourth evil which the desires cause in
the soul is that they stain and defile it, as is taught in Ecclesiasticus, in these words:
Qui tetigerit picem, inquinabitur ab ea.[155] This signifies: He that toucheth pitch shall
be defiled with it. And a man touches pitch when he allows the desire of his will to be
satisfied by any creature. Here it is to be noted that the Wise Man compares the creatures
to pitch; for there is more difference between excellence of soul and the best of the
creatures[156] than there is between pure diamond,[157] or fine gold, and pitch. And just
as gold or diamond, if it were heated and placed upon pitch, would become foul and be
stained by it, inasmuch as the heat would have cajoled and allured the pitch, even so the
soul that is hot with desire for any creature draws forth foulness from it through the
heat of its desire and is stained by it. And there is more difference between the soul and
other corporeal creatures than between a liquid that is highly clarified and mud that is
most foul. Wherefore, even as such a liquid would be defiled if it were mingled with mud,
so is the soul defiled that clings to creatures, since by doing this it becomes like to
the said creatures. And in the same way that traces of soot would defile a face that is
very lovely and perfect, even in this way do disordered desires befoul and defile the soul
that has them, the which soul is in itself a most lovely and perfect image of God.
2. Wherefore Jeremias, lamenting the ravages
of foulness which these disordered affections cause in the soul, speaks first of its
beauty, and then of its foulness, saying: Candidiores sunt Nazaroei ejus nive, nitidiores
lacte, rubicundiores ebore antiquo, sapphiro pulchriores. Denigrata est super carbones
facies eorum, et non sunt cogniti in plateis.[158] Which signifies: Its hair -- that is to
say, that of the soul -- is more excellent in whiteness than the snow, clearer[159] than
milk, and ruddier than old ivory, and lovelier than the sapphire stone. Their face has now
become blacker than coal and they are not known in the streets.[160] By the hair we here
understand the affections and thoughts of the soul, which, ordered as God orders them --
that is, in God Himself -- are whiter than snow, and clearer[161] than milk, and ruddier
than ivory, and lovelier than the sapphire. By these four things is understood every kind
of beauty and excellence of corporeal creatures, higher than which, says the writer, are
the soul and its operations, which are the Nazarites or the hair aforementioned; the which
Nazarites, being unruly,[162] with their lives ordered in a way that God ordered not --
that is, being set upon the creatures -- have their face (says Jeremias) made and turned
blacker than coal.
3. All this harm, and more, is done to the
beauty of the soul by its unruly desires for the things of this world; so much so that, if
we set out to speak of the foul and vile appearance that the desires can give the soul, we
should find nothing, however full of cobwebs and worms it might be, not even the
corruption of a dead body, nor aught else that is impure and vile, nor aught that can
exist and be imagined in this life, to which we could compare it. For, although it is true
that the unruly soul, in its natural being, is as perfect as when God created it, yet, in
its reasonable being, it is vile, abominable, foul, black and full of all the evils that
are here being described, and many more. For, as we shall afterwards say, a single unruly
desire, although there be in it no matter of mortal sin, suffices to bring a soul into
such bondage, foulness and vileness that it can in no wise come to accord with God in
union[163] until the desire be purified. What, then, will be the vileness of the soul that
is completely unrestrained with respect to its own passions and given up to its desires,
and how far removed will it be from God and from His purity?
4. It is impossible to explain in words, or
to cause to be understood by the understanding, what variety of impurity is caused in the
soul by a variety of desires. For, if it could be expressed and understood, it would be a
wondrous thing, and one also which would fill us with pity, to see how each desire, in
accordance with its quality and degree, be it greater or smaller, leaves in the soul its
mark and deposit of impurity and vileness, and how one single disorder of the reason can
be the source of innumerable different impurities, some greater, some less, each one after
its kind. For, even as the soul of the righteous man has in one single perfection, which
is uprightness of soul, innumerable gifts of the greatest richness, and many virtues of
the greatest loveliness, each one different and full of grace after its kind according to
the multitude and the diversity of the affections of love which it has had in God, even so
the unruly soul, according to the variety of the desires which it has for the creatures,
has in itself a miserable variety of impurities and meannesses, wherewith it is
endowed[164] by the said desires.
5. The variety of these desires is well
illustrated in the Book of Ezechiel, where it is written that God showed this Prophet, in
the interior of the Temple, painted around its walls, all likenesses of creeping things
which crawl on the ground, and all the abomination of unclean beasts.[165] And then God
said to Ezechiel: 'Son of man, hast thou not indeed seen the abominations that these do,
each one in the secrecy of his chamber?'[166] And God commanded the Prophet to go in
farther and he would see greater abominations; and he says that he there saw women seated,
weeping for Adonis, the god of love.[167] And God commanded him to go in farther still,
and he would see yet greater abominations, and he says that he saw there five-and-twenty
old men whose backs were turned toward the Temple.[168]
6. The diversity of creeping things and
unclean beasts that were painted in the first chamber of the Temple are the thoughts and
conceptions which the understanding fashions from the lowly things of earth, and from all
the creatures, which are painted, just as they are, in the temple of the soul, when the
soul embarrasses its understanding with them, which is the soul's first habitation. The
women that were farther within, in the second habitation, weeping for the god Adonis, are
the desires that are in the second faculty of the soul, which is the will; the which are,
as it were, weeping, inasmuch as they covet that to which the will is affectioned, which
are the creeping things painted in the understandings. And the men that were in the third
habitation are the images and representations of the creatures, which the third part of
the soul -- namely memory -- keeps and reflects upon[169] within itself. Of these it is
said that their backs are turned toward the Temple because when the soul, according to
these three faculties, completely and perfectly embraces anything that is of the earth, it
can be said to have its back turned toward the Temple of God, which is the right reason of
the soul, which admits within itself nothing that is of creatures.
7. And let this now suffice for the
understanding of this foul disorder of the soul with respect to its desires. For if we had
to treat in detail of the lesser foulness which these imperfections and their variety make
and cause in the soul, and that which is caused by venial sins, which is still greater
than that of the imperfections, and their great variety, and likewise that which is caused
by the desires for mortal sin, which is complete foulness of the soul, and its great
variety, according to the variety and multitude of all these three things, we should never
end, nor would the understanding of angels suffice to understand it. That which I say, and
that which is to the point for my purpose, is that any desire, although it be for but the
smallest imperfection, stains and defiles the soul.
CHAPTER X
Wherein is described how the desires weaken
the soul in virtue and make it lukewarm.
THE fifth way in which the desires harm the
soul is by making it lukewarm and weak, so that it has no strength to follow after virtue
and to persevere therein. For as the strength of the desire, when it is set upon various
aims, is less than if it were set wholly on one thing alone, and as, the more are the aims
whereon it is set, the less of it there is for each of them, for this cause philosophers
say that virtue in union is stronger than if it be dispersed. Wherefore it is clear that,
if the desire of the will be dispersed among other things than virtue, it must be weaker
as regards virtue. And thus the soul whose will is set upon various trifles is like water,
which, having a place below wherein to empty itself, never rises; and such a soul has no
profit. For this cause the patriarch Jacob compared his son Ruben to water poured out,
because in a certain sin he had given rein to his desires. And he said: Thou art poured
out like water; grow thou not.'[170] As though he had said: Since thou art poured out like
water as to the desires, thou shalt not grow in virtue. And thus, as hot water, when
uncovered, readily loses heat, and as aromatic spices, when they are unwrapped, gradually
lose the fragrance and strength of their perfume, even so the soul that is not recollected
in one single desire for God loses heat and vigour in its virtue. This was well understood
by David, when he said, speaking with God: I will keep my strength for Thee.[171] That is,
concentrating the strength of my desires upon Thee alone.
2. And the desires weaken the virtue of the
soul, because they are to it like the shoots that grow about a tree, and take away its
virtue so that it cannot bring forth so much fruit. And of such souls as these says the
Lord: Voe proegnantibus, et nutrientibus in illis diebus.[172] That is: Woe to them that
in those days are with child and to them that give suck. This being with child and giving
suck is understood with respect to the desires; which, if they be not pruned, will ever be
taking more virtue from the soul, and will grow to the harm of the soul, like the shoots
upon the tree. Wherefore Our Lord counsels us, saying: Have your loins girt about[173] --
the loins signifying here the desires. And indeed, they are also like leeches, which are
ever sucking the blood from the veins, for thus the Preacher terms them when he says: The
leeches are the daughters -- that is, the desires -- saying ever: Daca, daca.[174]
3. From this it is clear that the desires
bring no good to the soul but rather take from it that which it has; and, if it mortify
them not, they will not cease till they have wrought in it that which the children of the
viper are said to work in their mother; who, as they are growing within her womb, consume
her and kill her, and they themselves remain alive at her cost. Just so the desires that
are not mortified grow to such a point that they kill the soul with respect to God because
it has not first killed them. And they alone live in it. Wherefore the Preacher says:
Aufer a me Domine ventris concupiscentias.[175]
4. And, even though they reach not this
point, it is very piteous to consider how the desires that live in this poor soul treat
it, how unhappy it is with regard to itself, how dry with respect to its neighbours, and
how weary and slothful with respect to the things of God. For there is no evil humour that
makes it as wearisome and difficult for a sick man to walk, or gives him a distaste for
eating comparable to the weariness and distaste for following virtue which is given to a
soul by desire for creatures. And thus the reason why many souls have no diligence and
eagerness to gain virtue is, as a rule, that they have desires and affections which are
not pure and are not fixed upon God.[176]
CHAPTER
XI
Wherein it is proved necessary that the soul
that would attain to Divine union should be free from desires, however slight they be.
I EXPECT that for a long time the reader has
been wishing to ask whether it be necessary, in order to attain to this high estate of
perfection, to undergo first of all total mortification in all the desires, great and
small, or if it will suffice to mortify some of them and to leave others, those at least
which seem of little moment. For it appears to be a severe and most difficult thing for
the soul to be able to attain to such purity and detachment that it has no will and
affection for anything.
2. To this I reply: first, that it is true
that all the desires are not equally hurtful, nor do they all equally embarrass the soul.
I am speaking of those that are voluntary, for the natural desires hinder the soul little,
if at all, from attaining to union, when they are not consented to nor pass beyond the
first movements (I mean,[177] all those wherein the rational will has had no part, whether
at first or afterward); and to take away these -- that is, to mortify them wholly in this
life -- is impossible. And these hinder not the soul in such a way as to prevent its
attainment to Divine union, even though they be not, as I say, wholly mortified; for the
natural man may well have them, and yet the soul may be quite free from them according to
the rational spirit. For it will sometimes come to pass that the soul will be in the
full[178] union of the prayer of quiet in the will at the very time when these desires are
dwelling in the sensual part of the soul, and yet the higher part, which is in prayer,
will have nothing to do with them. But all the other voluntary desires, whether they be of
mortal sin, which are the gravest, or of venial sin, which are less grave, or whether they
be only of imperfections, which are the least grave of all, must be driven away every one,
and the soul must be free from them all, howsoever slight they be, if it is to come to
this complete union; and the reason is that the state of this Divine union consists in the
soul's total transformation, according to the will, in the will of God, so that, there may
be naught in the soul that is contrary to the will of God, but that, in all and through
all, its movement may be that of the will of God alone.
3. It is for this reason that we say of this
state that it is the making of two wills into one -- namely, into the will of God, which
will of God is likewise the will of the soul. For if this soul desired any imperfection
that God wills not, there would not be made one will of God, since the soul would have a
will for that which God has not. It is clear, then, that for the soul to come to unite
itself perfectly with God through love and will, it must first be free from all desire of
the will, howsoever slight. That is, that it must not intentionally and knowingly consent
with the will to imperfections, and it must have power and liberty to be able not so to
consent intentionally. I say knowingly, because, unintentionally and unknowingly, or
without having the power to do otherwise, it may well fall into imperfections and venial
sins, and into the natural desires whereof we have spoken; for of such sins as these which
are not voluntary and surreptitious it is written that the just man shall fall seven times
in the day and shall rise up again.[179] But of the voluntary desires, which, though they
be for very small things, are, as I have said, intentional venial sins, any one that is
not conquered suffices to impede union.[180] I mean, if this habit be not mortified; for
sometimes certain acts of different desires have not as much power when the habits are
mortified. Still, the soul will attain to the stage of not having even these, for they
likewise proceed from a habit of imperfection. But some habits of voluntary imperfections,
which are never completely conquered, prevent not only the attainment of Divine union, but
also progress in perfection.
4. These habitual imperfections are, for
example, a common custom of much speaking, or some slight attachment which we never quite
wish to conquer -- such as that to a person, a garment, a book, a cell, a particular kind
of food, tittle-tattle, fancies for tasting, knowing or hearing certain things, and
suchlike. Any one of these imperfections, if the soul has become attached and habituated
to it, is of as great harm to its growth and progress in virtue as though it were to fall
daily into many other imperfections and usual venial sins which proceed not from a
habitual indulgence in any habitual and harmful attachment, and will not hinder it so much
as when it has attachment to anything. For as long as it has this there is no possibility
that it will make progress in perfection, even though the imperfection be extremely
slight. For it comes to the same thing whether a bird be held by a slender cord or by a
stout one; since, even if it be slender, the bird will be well held as though it were
stout, for so long as it breaks it not and flies not away. It is true that the slender one
is the easier to break; still, easy though it be, the bird will not fly away if it be not
broken. And thus the soul that has attachment to anything, however much virtue it possess,
will not attain to the liberty of Divine union. For the desire and the attachment of the
soul have that power which the sucking- fish[181] is said to have when it clings to a
ship; for, though but a very small fish, if it succeed in clinging to the ship, it makes
it incapable of reaching the port, or of sailing on at all. It is sad to see certain souls
in this plight; like rich vessels, they are laden with wealth and good works and spiritual
exercises, and with the virtues and the favours that God grants them; and yet, because
they have not the resolution to break with some whim or attachment or affection (which all
come to the same thing), they never make progress or reach the port of perfection, though
they would need to do no more than make one good flight and thus to snap that cord of
desire right off, or to rid themselves of that sucking-fish of desire which clings to
them.
5. It is greatly to be lamented that, when
God has granted them strength to break other and stouter cords[182] -- namely, affections
for sins and vanities -- they should fail to attain to such blessing because they have not
shaken off some childish thing which God had bidden them conquer for love of Him, and
which is nothing more than a thread or a hair.[183] And, what is worse, not only do they
make no progress, but because of this attachment they fall back, lose that which they have
gained, and retrace that part of the road along which they have travelled at the cost of
so much time and labour; for it is well known that, on this road, not to go forward is to
turn back, and not to be gaining is to be losing. This Our Lord desired to teach us when
He said: 'He that is not with Me is against Me; and he that gathereth not with Me
scattereth.'[184] He that takes not the trouble to repair the vessel, however slight be
the crack in it, is likely to spill all the liquid that is within it. The Preacher taught
us this clearly when he said: He that contemneth small things shall fall by little and
little.[185] For, as he himself says, a great fire cometh from a single spark.[186] And
thus one imperfection is sufficient to lead to another; and these lead to yet more;
wherefore you will hardly ever see a soul that is negligent in conquering one desire, and
that has not many more arising from the same weakness and imperfection that this desire
causes. In this way they are continually filling; we have seen many persons to whom God
has been granting the favour of leading them a long way, into a state of great detachment
and liberty, yet who, merely through beginning to indulge some slight attachment, under
the pretext of doing good, or in the guise of conversation and friendship, often lose
their spirituality and desire for God and holy solitude, fall from the joy and
wholehearted devotion which they had in their spiritual exercises, and cease not until
they have lost everything; and this because they broke not with that beginning of sensual
desire and pleasure and kept not themselves in solitude for God.
6. Upon this road we must ever journey in
order to attain our goal; which means that we must ever be mortifying our desires and not
indulging them; and if they are not all completely mortified we shall not completely
attain. For even as a log of wood may fail to be transformed in the fire because a single
degree of heat is wanting to it, even so the soul will not be transformed in God if it
have but one imperfection, although it be something less than voluntary desire; for, as we
shall say hereafter concerning the night of faith, the soul has only one will, and that
will, if it be embarrassed by aught and set upon by aught, is not free, solitary, and
pure, as is necessary for Divine transformation.
7. Of this that has been said we have a
figure in the Book of the Judges, where it is related that the angel came to the children
of Israel and said to them that, because they had not destroyed that forward people, but
had made a league with some of them, they would therefore be left among them as enemies,
that they might be to them an occasion of stumbling and perdition.[187] And just so does
God deal with certain souls: though He has taken them out of the world, and slain the
giants, their sins, and destroyed the multitude of their enemies, which are the occasions
of sin that they encountered in the world, solely that they may enter this Promised Land
of Divine union with greater liberty, yet they harbour friendship and make alliance with
the insignificant peoples[188] -- that is, with imperfections -- and mortify them not
completely; therefore Our Lord is angry, and allows them to fall into their desires and go
from bad to worse.
8. In the Book of Josue, again, we have a
figure of what has just been said -- where we read that God commanded Josue, at the time
that he had to enter into possession of the Promised Land, to destroy all things that were
in the city of Jericho, in such wise as to leave therein nothing alive, man or woman,
young or old, and to slay all the beasts, and to take naught, neither to covet aught, of
all the spoils.[189] This He said that we may understand how, if a man is to enter this
Divine union, all that lives in his soul must die, both little and much, small and great,
and that the soul must be without desire for all this, and detached from it, even as
though it existed not for the soul, neither the soul for it. This Saint Paul teaches us
clearly in his epistle ad Corinthios, saying: 'This I say to you, brethren, that the time
is short; it remains, and it behoves you, that they that have wives should be as if they
had none; and they that weep for the things of this world, as though they wept not; and
they that rejoice, as if they rejoiced not; and they that buy, as though they possessed
not; and they that use this world, as if they used it not.'[190] This the Apostle says to
us in order to teach us how complete must be the detachment of our soul from all things if
it is to journey to God.
CHAPTER
XII
Which treats of the answer to another
question, explaining what the desires are that suffice to cause the evils aforementioned
in the soul.
WE might write at greater length upon this
matter of the night of sense, saying all that there is to say concerning the harm which is
caused by the desires, not only in the ways aforementioned, but in many others. But for
our purpose that which has been said suffices; for we believe we have made it clear in
what way the mortification of these desires is called night, and how it behoves us to
enter this night in order to journey to God. The only thing that remains, before we treat
of the manner of entrance therein, in order to bring this part to a close, is a question
concerning what has been said which might occur to the reader.
2. It may first be asked if any desire can
be sufficient to work and produce in the soul the two evils aforementioned -- namely, the
privative, which consists in depriving the soul of the grace of God, and the positive,
which consists in producing within it the five serious evils whereof we have spoken.
Secondly, it may be asked if any desire, however slight it be and of whatever kind,
suffices to produce all these together, or if some desires produce some and others produce
others. If, for example, some produce torment; others, weariness; others, darkness, etc.
3. Answering this question, I say, first of
all, that with respect to the privative evil -- which consists in the soul's being
deprived of God -- this is wrought wholly, and can only be wrought, by the voluntary
desires, which are of the matter of mortal sin; for they deprive the soul of grace in this
life, and of glory, which is the possession of God, in the next. In the second place, I
say that both those desires which are of the matter of mortal sin, and the voluntary
desires, which are of the matter of venial sin, and those that are of the matter of
imperfection, are each sufficient to produce in the soul all these positive evils
together; the which evils, although in a certain way they are privative, we here call
positive, since they correspond to a turning towards the creature, even as the privative
evils correspond to a turning away from God. But there is this difference, that the
desires which are of mortal sin produce total blindness, torment, impurity, weakness, etc.
Those others, however, which are of the matter of venial sin or imperfection, produce not
these evils in a complete and supreme degree, since they deprive not the soul of grace,
upon the loss of which depends the possession of them, since the death of the soul is
their life; but they produce them in the soul remissly, proportionately to the remission
of grace which these desires produce in the soul.[191] So that desire which most weakens
grace will produce the most abundant torment, blindness and defilement.
4. It should be noted, however, that,
although each desire produces all these evils, which we here term positive, there are some
which, principally and directly, produce some of them, and others which produce others,
and the remainder are produced consequently upon these. For, although it is true that one
sensual desire produces all these evils, yet its principal and proper effect is the
defilement of soul and body. And, although one avaricious desire produces them all, its
principal and direct result is to produce misery. And, although similarly one vainglorious
desire produces them all, its principal and direct result is to produce darkness and
blindness. And, although one gluttonous desire produces them all, its principal result is
to produce lukewarmness in virtue. And even so is it with the rest.
5. And the reason why any act of voluntary
desire produces in the soul all these effects together lies in the direct contrariety
which exists between them and all the acts of virtue which produce the contrary effects in
the soul. For, even as an act of virtue produces and begets in the soul sweetness, peace,
consolation, light, cleanness and fortitude altogether, even so an unruly desire causes
torment, fatigue, weariness, blindness and weakness. All the virtues grow through the
practice of any one of them, and all the vices grow through the practice of any one of
them likewise, and the remnants[192] of each grow in the soul. And although all these
evils are not evident at the moment when the desire is indulged, since the resulting
pleasure gives no occasion for them, yet the evil remnants which they leave are clearly
perceived, whether before or afterwards. This is very well illustrated by that book which
the angel commanded Saint John to eat, in the Apocalypse, the which book was sweetness to
his mouth, and in his belly bitterness.[193] For the desire, when it is carried into
effect, is sweet and appears to be good, but its bitter taste is felt afterwards; the
truth of this can be clearly proved by anyone who allows himself to be led away by it. Yet
I am not ignorant that there are some men so blind and insensible as not to feel this,
for, as they do not walk in God, they are unable to perceive that which hinders them from
approaching Him.
6. I am not writing here of the other
natural desires which are not voluntary, and of thoughts that go not beyond the first
movements, and other temptations to which the soul is not consenting; for these produce in
the soul none of the evils aforementioned. For, although a person who suffers from them
may think that the passion and disturbance which they then produce in him are defiling and
blinding him, this is not the case; rather they are bringing him the opposite advantages.
For, in so far as he resists them, he gains fortitude, purity, light and consolation, and
many blessings, even as Our Lord said to Saint Paul: That virtue was made perfect in
weakness.[194] But the voluntary desires work all the evils aforementioned, and more.
Wherefore the principal care of spiritual masters is to mortify their disciples
immediately with respect to any desire soever, by causing them to remain without the
objects of their desires, in order to free them from such great misery.
CHAPTER
XIII
Wherein is described the manner and way
which the soul must follow in order to enter this night of sense.
IT now remains for me to give certain
counsels whereby the soul may know how to enter this night of sense and may be able so to
do. To this end it must be known that the soul habitually enters this night of sense in
two ways: the one is active; the other passive. The active way consists in that which the
soul can do, and does, of itself, in order to enter therein, whereof we shall now treat in
the counsels which follow. The passive way is that wherein the soul does nothing, and God
works in it, and it remains, as it were, patient. Of this we shall treat in the fourth
book, where we shall be treating of beginners. And because there, with the Divine favour,
we shall give many counsels to beginners, according to the many imperfections which they
are apt to have while on this road, I shall not spend time in giving many here. And this,
too, because it belongs not to this place to give them, as at present we are treating only
of the reasons for which this journey is called a night, and of what kind it is, and how
many parts it has. But, as it seems that it would be incomplete, and less profitable than
it should be, if we gave no help or counsel here for walking in this night of desires, I
have thought well to set down briefly here the way which is to be followed: and I shall do
the same at the end of each of the next two parts, or causes, of this night, whereof, with
the help of the Lord, I have to treat.
2. These counsels for the conquering of the
desires, which now follow, albeit brief and few, I believe to be as profitable and
efficacious as they are concise; so that one who sincerely desires to practice them will
need no others, but will find them all included in these.
3. First, let him have an habitual
desire[195] to imitate Christ in everything that he does, conforming himself to His life;
upon which life he must meditate so that he may know how to imitate it, and to behave in
all things as Christ would behave.
4. Secondly, in order that he may be able to
do this well, every pleasure that presents itself to the senses, if it be not purely for
the honour and glory of God, must be renounced and completely rejected for the love of
Jesus Christ, Who in this life had no other pleasure, neither desired any, than to do the
will of His Father, which He called His meat and food.[196] I take this example. If there
present itself to a man the pleasure of listening to things that tend not to the service
and honour of God, let him not desire that pleasure, nor desire to listen to them; and if
there present itself the pleasure of looking at things that help him not Godward, let him
not desire the pleasure or look at these things; and if in conversation or in aught else
soever such pleasure present itself, let him act likewise. And similarly with respect to
all the senses, in so far as he can fairly avoid the pleasure in question; if he cannot,
it suffices that, although these things may be present to his senses, he desires not to
have this pleasure. And in this wise he will be able to mortify and void his senses of
such pleasure, as though they were in darkness. If he takes care to do this, he will soon
reap great profit.
5. For the mortifying and calming of the
four natural passions, which are joy, hope, fear and grief, from the concord and
pacification whereof come these and other blessings, the counsels here following are of
the greatest help, and of great merit, and the source of great virtues.
6. Strive always to prefer, not that which
is easiest, but that which is most difficult; Not that which is most delectable, but that
which is most unpleasing; Not that which gives most pleasure, but rather that which gives
least; Not that which is restful, but that which is wearisome; Not that which is
consolation, but rather that which is disconsolateness; Not that which is greatest, but
that which is least; Not that which is loftiest and most precious, but that which is
lowest and most despised; Not that which is[197] a desire for anything, but that which is
a desire for nothing; Strive to go about seeking not the best of temporal things, but the
worst. Strive thus to desire to enter into complete detachment and emptiness and poverty,
with respect to everything that is in the world, for Christ's sake.
7. And it is meet that the soul embrace
these acts with all its heart and strive to subdue its will thereto. For, if it perform
them with its heart, it will very quickly come to find in them great delight and
consolation, and to act with order and discretion.
8. These things that have been said, if they
be faithfully put into practice, are quite sufficient for entrance into the night of
sense; but, for greater completeness, we shall describe another kind of exercise which
teaches us to mortify the concupiscence of the flesh and the concupiscence of the eyes,
and the pride of life, which, says Saint John,[198] are the things that reign in the
world, from which all the other desires proceed.
9. First, let the soul strive to work in its
own despite, and desire all to do so. Secondly, let it strive to speak in its own despite
and desire all to do so. Third, let it strive to think humbly of itself, in its own
despite, and desire all to do so.
10. To conclude these counsels and rules, it
will be fitting to set down here those lines which are written in the Ascent of the Mount,
which is the figure that is at the beginning of this book; the which lines are
instructions for ascending to it, and thus reaching the summit of union. For, although it
is true that that which is there spoken of is spiritual and interior, there is reference
likewise to the spirit of imperfection according to sensual and exterior things, as may be
seen by the two roads which are on either side of the path of perfection. It is in this
way and according to this sense that we shall understand them here; that is to say,
according to that which is sensual. Afterwards, in the second part of this night, they
will be understood according to that which is spiritual.[199]
11. The lines are these: In order to arrive
at having pleasure in everything, Desire to have pleasure in nothing. In order to arrive
at possessing everything, Desire to possess nothing. In order to arrive at being
everything, Desire to be nothing. In order to arrive at knowing everything, Desire to know
nothing.[200] In order to arrive at that wherein thou hast no pleasure, Thou must go by a
way wherein thou hast no pleasure. In order to arrive at that which thou knowest not, Thou
must go by a way that thou knowest not. In order to arrive at that which thou possessest
not, Thou must go by a way that thou possessest not. In order to arrive at that which thou
art not, Thou must go through that which thou art not.
12. When thy mind dwells upon anything, Thou
art ceasing to cast thyself upon the All. For, in order to pass from the all to the All,
Thou hast to deny thyself wholly[201] in all. And, when thou comest to possess it wholly,
Thou must possess it without desiring anything. For, if thou wilt have anything in having
all,[202] Thou hast not thy treasure purely in God.
13. In this detachment the spiritual soul
finds its quiet and repose; for, since it covets nothing, nothing wearies it when it is
lifted up, and nothing oppresses it when it is cast down, because it is in the centre of
its humility; but when it covets anything, at that very moment it becomes wearied.
CHAPTER
XIV
Wherein is expounded the second line of the
stanza.
Kindled in love with yearnings.
NOW that we have expounded the first line of
this stanza, which treats of the night of sense, explaining what this night of sense is,
and why it is called night; and now that we have likewise described the order and manner
which are to be followed for a soul to enter therein actively, the next thing to be
treated in due sequence is its properties and effects, which are wonderful, and are
described in the next lines of the stanza aforementioned, upon which I will briefly touch
for the sake of expounding the said lines, as I promised in the Prologue;[203] and I will
then pass on at once to the second book, treating of the other part of this night, which
is the spiritual.
2. The soul, then, says that, 'kindled in
love with yearnings,' it passed through this dark night of sense and came out thence to
the union of the Beloved. For, in order to conquer all the desires and to deny itself the
pleasures which it has in everything, and for which its love and affection are wont to
enkindle the will that it may enjoy them, it would need to experience another and a
greater enkindling by an other and a better love, which is that of its Spouse; to the end
that, having its pleasure set upon Him and deriving from Him its strength, it should have
courage and constancy to deny itself all other things with ease. And, in order to conquer
the strength of the desires of sense, it would need, not only to have love for its Spouse,
but also to be enkindled by love and to have yearnings. For it comes to pass, and so it
is, that with such yearnings of desire the sensual nature is moved and attracted toward
sensual things, so that, if the spiritual part be not enkindled with other and greater
yearnings for that which is spiritual, it will be unable to throw off the yoke of
nature[204] or to enter this night of sense, neither will it have courage to remain in
darkness as to all things, depriving itself of desire for them all.
3. And the nature and all the varieties of
these yearnings of love which souls experience in the early stages of this road to union;
and the diligent means and contrivances which they employ in order to leave their house,
which is self-will, during the night of the mortification of their senses; and how easy,
and even sweet and delectable, these yearnings for the Spouse make all the trials and
perils of this night to appear to them, this is not the place to describe, neither is such
description possible; for it is better to know and meditate upon these things than to
write of them. And so we shall pass on to expound the remaining lines in the next chapter.
CHAPTER
XV
Wherein are expounded the remaining lines of
the aforementioned stanza.
. . . oh, happy chance! -- I went forth
without being observed, My house being now at rest.
THESE lines take as a metaphor the miserable
estate of captivity, a man's deliverance from which, when none of the gaolers' hinder his
release, he considers a 'happy chance.' For the soul, on account of[205] original sin, is
truly as it were a captive in this mortal body, subject to the passions and desires of
nature, from bondage and subjection to which it considers its having gone forth without
being observed as a 'happy chance' -- having gone forth, that is, without being impeded or
engulfed[206] by any of them.
2. For to this end the soul profited by
going forth upon a 'dark night' -- that is, in the privation of all pleasures and
mortification of all desires, after the manner whereof we have spoken. And by its 'house
being now at rest' is meant the sensual part, which is the house of all the desires, and
is now at rest because they have all been overcome and lulled to sleep. For until the
desires are lulled to sleep through the mortification of the sensual nature, and until at
last the sensual nature itself is at rest from them, so that they make not war upon the
spirit, the soul goes not forth to true liberty and to the fruition of union with its
Beloved.
END OF THE FIRST BOOK
FOOTNOTES
[1] [Lit., 'appetites,' but
this word is uniformly translated 'desires,' as the Spanish context frequently will not
admit the use of the stronger word in English.]
[2] [The word translated 'sensual' is sometimes sensual, and sometimes, as here,
sensitivo. The meaning in either case is simply 'of sense.']
[3] So Alc. The other authorities read: 'and of this we shall treat likewise, in the
second part with respect to the activity [of the soul] [these last three words are not
contained in the Spanish of any authority], and in the third and the fourth part with
respect to its passivity.' E.p. follows this division. Alc., however, seems to correspond
more closely with the Saint's intentions; for he did not divide each of his 'books' into
'parts' and appears therefore to indicate by 'part' what we know as 'book.' Now Book I is
in fact devoted to the active purgation of sense, as are Books II and III to the active
purgation of the spirit. For the 'fourth book,' see General Introduction, IV above.
[4] [The word translated 'at rest' is a past participle: more literally, +stilled.']
[5] [Lit., 'and it in them.' This 'it' means the soul; the preceding 'it,' the
house.]
[6] I.e., in the 'Argument.'
[7] [More exactly, this 'passage' or 'transition' (transito).]
[8] [Lit., 'in negation of them.']
[9] [By 'the mean' is meant the middle, or main part, of the journey.]
[10] [Lit., 'without anything (sc. to do).']
[84] ['Blank board': Sp., tabla rasa; Lat., tabula rasa.]
[85] Psalm lxxxvii, 16 [A.V. lxxxviii, 15].
[86] St. John i, 5.
[87] 2 Corinthians vi, 14.
[88] Psalm cxiv, 9 [A.V. cxv, 8].
[89] Jeremias iv, 23.
[90] [The words often translated 'deformity,' 'deformed,' or 'vileness,' 'vile,' are
the ordinary contraries of 'beauty,' 'beautiful,' and might be rendered, more literally
but less elegantly, 'ugliness,' 'ugly.'] [91] Proverbs xxxi, 30. [92] [For 'grace . . .
misery' the Spanish has gracia . . . desgracia. The latter word, however, does not, as
might be supposed, correspond to English 'disgrace.'] [93] E.p. omits 'supreme'; the
Spanish word [having a more literally superlative force than the English] can hardly be
applied, save in a restricted sense, to what is finite. [94] St. Luke xviii, 19. [95] 1
Corinthians iii, 19. [96] Romans i, 22. [97] 1 Corinthians iii, 18-19. [98] [Lit., 'is
supreme.'] [99] [The word is applicable to any kind of preferential position.] [100]
Genesis xxi, 10. [101] Proverbs viii, 4-6, 18-21. [102] Soliloq., chap. ii (Migne: Patr.
lat., Vol. XL, p. 866). [103] So Alc. The other authorities have merely: 'which may
pertain to it,' and e.p. adds to this: 'through self-love.' Even when softened by Diego de
Pesus this phrase of the Saint did not escape denunciation, and it was the first of the
'propositions' condemned in his writings (cf. General Introduction, VI, above). It was
defended by P. Basilio Ponce de Leon in his Reply (p. lx), and more extensively by P.
Nicolas de Jesus Maria (Elucidatio, Pt. II, Chap i, pp. 125-40). In reality, little
defence is needed other than that contained in the last chapters of the Ascent of Mount
Carmel, which clearly show the harm caused by supernatural favours, when these are abused,
to the memory, the understanding and the will. Who, after all, can doubt that we may abuse
'things supernatural' and by such abuse hinder the soul from attaining union with God?
[104] St. Luke xiv, 33. [105] E.p. alters this to: 'in the same Scripture.' [It does not,
in fact, occur in the same book.] [106] Numbers xi, 4. [107] [Lit., 'so high.'] [108]
[Wisdom xvi, 20.] [109] Psalm lxxvii, 31 [A.V. lxxviii, 31]. [110] [Exodus xxxiv, 2-3.]
E.p.: 'within sight of the Mount.' A, B: 'near the Mount.' [111] Gen. xxxv, 2. [112]
Exodus xxvii, 8. [113] Leviticus x, 1-2. [114] 1 Kings [A.V., I Samuel] v, 3-5. [115]
Deut. xxxi, 26. [116] Numbers xvii, 10. [More properly, 'the rod of Aaron.'] [117]
Jeremias ii, 13. [118] [Lit., 'the greater the bulk that that desire has in the soul.']
[119] St. Matthew xv, 26. [120] St. Matthew vii, 6. [121] [Lit., 'he that goes feeding
upon.'] [122] Psalm lviii, 15-16 [A.V., lix, 14-15]. [123] [Lit., 'how much more God
does.'] [124] Isaias xxix, 8. The editions supply the translation of the first part of the
Latin text, which the Saint and the Codices omitted: 'After being wearied and fatigued, he
yet thirsteth,' etc. [125] Job xx, 22. [126] Isaias lvii, 20. [127] Jeremias ii, 24. [128]
Jeremias ii, 25. [129] Isaias ix, 20. [130] Thus Alc. [with 'run' for 'eat']. A, B, e.p.
read: '. . . when they turn from the way of God (which is the right hand) are justly
hungered, for they merit not the fullness of the sweetness of spirit. And justly, too,
when they eat on the left hand,' etc. [While agreeing with P. Silverio that Alc. gives the
better reading, I prefer 'eat' to 'run': it is nearer the Scriptural passage and the two
Spanish words, comen and corren, could easily be confused in MS.] [131] Psalm cxviii, 61
[A.V., cxix, 61]. [132] Psalm cxvii, 12 [A.V., cxviii, 12]. [133] Judges xvi, 16.
[Actually it was Samson, not Dalila, who was 'wearied even until death.'] [134] Apocalypse
xviii, 7. [135] [Lit., 'bound him to grind in a mill.'] [136] Judges xvi, 21. [137] Isaias
lv, 1-2. [138] St. Matthew xi, 28-9. [139] Psalm xxxvii, 5 [A.V., xxxviii, 4]. [140]
[Lit., 'gives no occasion either for,' etc.] [141] Psalm xxxix, 13 [A.V., xl, 12.] [142]
Psalm vi, 4 [A.V., vi, 3]. [143] [Lit., 'the present visage.'] [144] St. Matthew xv, 14.
[145] [hoguera. More exactly: 'fire,' 'bonfire,' 'blaze.'] [146] Psalm lvii, 9 [cf. A.V.,
lviii, 8]. [147] Psalm lvii, 10 [A.V., lviii, 9]. [148] [Lit., 'before it can understand
God.'] [149] 3 Kings [A.V., 1 Kings] xi, 4. [150] Ecclesiastes ii, 10. [151] [Lit., 'we
... know not what there is between.'] [152] Jonas iv, 11. [153] [Lit., +is added desire.+]
[154] Isaias lix, 10. [155] Ecclesiasticus xiii, 1. [156] [More literally: 'and all the
best that is of the creatures.' 'Best' is neuter and refers to qualities, appurtenances,
etc.] [157] [Lit., 'bright diamond.'] [158] Lamentations iv, 7-8. [159] [Lit., mas
resplandecientes, 'more brilliant,' 'more luminous.'] [160] [Lit., plazas (derived from
the Latin plateas), which now, however, has the meaning of 'squares,' '(market) places.']
[161] ['Clearer' here is mas claros; the adjective is rendered 'bright' elsewhere.] [162]
[The words translated 'unruly,' 'disordered,' here and elsewhere, and occasionally
'unrestrained,' are the same in the original: desordenado.] [163] [The Spanish of the text
reads literally: 'in a union.'] [164] [The verb is pintar, 'paint': perhaps 'corrupt' is
intended. The same verb occurs in the following sentence.] [165] Ezechiel viii, 10. [166]
[Ezechiel viii, 12.] [167] Ezechiel viii, 14. [168] Ezechiel viii, 16. [169] [Lit.,
'revolves'--'turns over in its mind' in our common idiom.] [170] Genesis xlix, 4. [171]
Psalm lviii, 10 [A.V., lix, 9]. [172] St. Matthew xxix, 19. [173] St. Luke xii, 25. [174]
Proverbs xxx, 15. [175] Ecclesiasticus xxiii, 6. [In the original the last two sentences
are transposed.] [176] [Lit., +not pure on (or +in+) God.+] [177] [The original has no
such explanatory phrase.] [178] [That is, will be enjoying all the union that the prayer
of quiet gives.] [179] Proverbs xxiv, 16. [180] [The original omits +union.+] [181] [Or
+remora.+] [182] [cordeles: a stronger word than that used above (hilo), which, if the
context would permit, might better be translated 'string' -- its equivalent in modern
speech. Below, hilo is translated 'thread.'] [183] [Hilo, rendered 'thread,' as explained
in n. 4 above, can also be taken in the stronger sense of 'cord.'] [184] St. Matthew xii,
30. [185] Ecclesiasticus xix, 1. [186] [Lit., 'the fire is increased by a single spark.']
Ecclesiasticus xi, 34 [A.V., xi, 32]. [187] Judges ii, 3. [188] [The original phrase
(gente menuda) means 'little folk.' It is used of children and sometimes also of insects
and other small creatures. There is a marked antithesis between the 'giants,' or sins, and
the 'little folk,' or imperfections.] [189] Josue vi, 21. [190] 1 Corinthians vii, 29-31.
[191] [The word here translated 'remissness' is rendered 'remission' in the text, where it
seems to have a slightly different meaning.] [192] [The word translated 'remnants' also
means 'after-taste.'] [193] Apocalypse x, 9. [194] 2 Corinthians xii, 9. ['Virtue' had
often, in the author's day, much of the meaning of the modern word 'strength.'] [195] [The
word used for desire is apetito, which has been used in the past chapters for desires of
sense (cf. chap. I, above).] [196] [St. John iv, 34.] [197] Lit., 'Not that which is to
desire anything, etc.'] [198] [1 St. John ii, 16.] [199] The Saint does not, however,
allude to these lines again. The order followed below is that of Alc., which differs
somewhat from that followed in the diagram. [200] [This line, like ll. 6, 8 of the
paragraph, reads more literally: 'Desire not to possess (be, know) anything in anything.'
It is more emphatic than l. 2.] [201] [There is a repetition here which could only be
indicated by translating 'all-ly.' So, too, in the next couplet.] [202] [Lit. +anything in
all.+] [203] This confirms our point (Bk. I, chap. ii, Sect. 6, above) that the Saint
considers the Argument as part of the Prologue. [204] Lit., 'to conquer the natural
yoke.'] [205] [Lit., +after.+]